• Home
  • Business taxes
  • Personal taxes
  • Capital taxes
  • International
  • VAT
  • Tax admin
  • Resources
  • Books
  • About
  • Contact
Claritax News
  • Home
  • Business taxes
  • Personal taxes
  • Capital taxes
  • International
  • VAT
  • Tax admin
  • Resources
  • Books
  • About
  • Contact
  • Business taxes
  • Personal taxes
  • Capital taxes
  • International
  • VAT
  • Tax admin
Claritax News

Income tax and CGT – special dividend – discovery assessment – review decision by HMRC – Buckingham

14 Apr 2023

This case involved a consideration of the interaction of the discovery powers and the statutory review provisions (Buckingham v HMRC [2023] UKFTT 358 (TC)). The key facts were summarised as follows at the start of the FTT decision:

  • HMRC’s case officer, Mr Butler, issued a closure notice in relation to certain special dividends, increasing Mr Buckingham’s overall tax liability by £10,599.15.
  • Mr Buckingham appealed that closure notice, and on 10 November 2020 Ms Laube, an HMRC review officer, correctly decided that HMRC had been out of time to open an enquiry under TMA s 9A. The closure notice was withdrawn.
  • On 15 December 2021, Mr Butler issued Mr Buckingham with a “discovery” assessment under TMA s 29; that assessment reflected the earlier closure notice amendment. Mr Buckingham appealed the discovery assessment and asked for a statutory review.
  • On 30 March 2022, Ms Amelia Vickerman issued her review decision, holding that the whole of the special dividend was income for UK tax purposes, and that the discovery assessment was therefore “varied” so as to increase the tax due from Mr Buckingham by a further £26,267.21.
  • Mr Buckingham notified his appeal to the Tribunal. In his grounds of appeal, he accepted Mr Butler’s income/capital split, but disagreed with Ms Vickerman’s review decision. At or around the same time, he paid the extra tax charged by Mr Butler’s assessment.

The FTT decided that Mr Butler’s discovery assessment was correct. The tribunal also held that Ms Vickerman’s statutory review decision was out of time. The FTT therefore did not increase the assessment made by Mr Butler.

The tribunal also specifically considered whether the conditions for a discovery assessment had been met and concluded that they had. In particular, no information had been provided on Mr Buckingham’s return as to the nature of the special dividend. The discovery assessment made by Mr Butler was therefore confirmed.

https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKFTT/TC/2023/TC08782.html

Related content from Claritax Books

Discovery Assessments, by tax barrister Keith Gordon, is a detailed, clearly written guide to the law and practice in this area. Based on the author’s personal involvement in many leading cases, the book contains much practical advice explaining when and how such assessments may be challenged.

Discovery Assessments

Latest articles (all topics)

  • Income tax self-assessment – HMRC encourage taxpayers to avoid stress by making an early start on their returns
  • The Social Security (Further Methods of Recovery) Regulations 2026
  • How to get authorised to act as a tax agent on behalf of your clients – HMRC update guidance
  • Compliance checks: prohibition of promotion of certain tax avoidance schemes – HMRC publish factsheet CC/FS91
Read more

Weekly email alerts

Sign up here for this free service.

wide banner

Recent Posts

  • Income tax self-assessment – HMRC encourage taxpayers to avoid stress by making an early start on their returns
  • The Social Security (Further Methods of Recovery) Regulations 2026
  • How to get authorised to act as a tax agent on behalf of your clients – HMRC update guidance
  • Compliance checks: prohibition of promotion of certain tax avoidance schemes – HMRC publish factsheet CC/FS91
  • R&D tax credits – HMRC publish official statistics

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

©2026 All Rights Reserved

Terms & Conditions | Privacy

Copy