• Home
  • Business taxes
  • Personal taxes
  • Capital taxes
  • International
  • VAT
  • Tax admin
  • Resources
  • Books
  • About
  • Contact
Claritax News
  • Home
  • Business taxes
  • Personal taxes
  • Capital taxes
  • International
  • VAT
  • Tax admin
  • Resources
  • Books
  • About
  • Contact
  • Business taxes
  • Personal taxes
  • Capital taxes
  • International
  • VAT
  • Tax admin
Claritax News

VAT – whether option to tax disapplied – Supreme Court to hand down judgment – Moulsdale t/a Moulsdale Properties

20 Mar 2023

The Supreme Court will hand down its judgment in respect of the Scottish case Moulsdale t/a Moulsdale Properties v HMRC [2021] CSIH 29 on 22 March 2023.

The Supreme Court heard the taxpayer’s appeal on 17 January 2023.

Recordings of the hearing may be watched here (Case ID: 2021/0216).

“Issue

Whether the taxpayer’s sale of certain property was a supply exempt from value added tax (“VAT”)? More specifically, whether the taxpayer intended or expected that the property sold was or would be a capital item in the hands of the purchaser under Schedule 10 of the VAT Act 1994, resulting in the taxpayer’s option to tax being disapplied?

Facts

Sales of land and buildings are generally exempt from VAT. However, an owner of land and buildings can opt to tax their property so that it then includes VAT. Schedule 10 of the VAT Act 1994 provides for compulsory disapplication of an option to tax in certain circumstances. If the relevant provisions apply, a sale of property where an option to tax has been exercised goes back to being a sale that is VAT exempt.

In 2001, David Moulsdale, trading as Moulsdale Properties (“Moulsdale”) purchased office property. Moulsdale exercised an option to tax over the property. In 2014, Moulsdale sold the property. When Moulsdale sold the property, VAT was not charged. Moulsdale argues he did not charge VAT because Schedule 10 of the VAT Act 1994 meant his option to tax was disapplied and so the sale of the building was VAT exempt. His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (“HMRC”) disagreed. HMRC’s position was that the option to tax was not disapplied under Schedule 10 of the VAT Act 1994. Accordingly, the sale was not tax exempt and Moulsdale should have accounted for VAT on the sale of the property which HMRC assessed to be £191,562 (plus interest of £11,491).”

https://www.supremecourt.uk/news/future-judgments.html

Related content from Claritax Books

Value Added Tax, written by Ciaran McGee MA (Oxon), FCA, CTA, is an extensive volume (over 1,000 pages), written primarily for non-VAT specialist accountants and tax advisers.

Value-Added-Tax

Latest articles (all topics)

  • Income tax self-assessment – HMRC encourage taxpayers to avoid stress by making an early start on their returns
  • The Social Security (Further Methods of Recovery) Regulations 2026
  • How to get authorised to act as a tax agent on behalf of your clients – HMRC update guidance
  • Compliance checks: prohibition of promotion of certain tax avoidance schemes – HMRC publish factsheet CC/FS91
Read more

Weekly email alerts

Sign up here for this free service.

wide banner

Recent Posts

  • Income tax self-assessment – HMRC encourage taxpayers to avoid stress by making an early start on their returns
  • The Social Security (Further Methods of Recovery) Regulations 2026
  • How to get authorised to act as a tax agent on behalf of your clients – HMRC update guidance
  • Compliance checks: prohibition of promotion of certain tax avoidance schemes – HMRC publish factsheet CC/FS91
  • R&D tax credits – HMRC publish official statistics

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

©2026 All Rights Reserved

Terms & Conditions | Privacy

Copy